Änderungen

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „Communication and organisation is a main concern of PiLife. Being a communication platform with political background, dedicated ways for decision-making in civili…“
Communication and organisation is a main concern of PiLife. Being a communication platform with political background, dedicated ways for decision-making in civilized manners therefor need to be especially considered.
Most decisions/elections can be done in public votings. For these, one can think of features like
* election modes (absolute/relative majority, how to count abstains, multichoice or yay/nay, ...)
* groupmanagement (to decide who is allowed to vote)
* timeout (from minutes to months, for meetings to longterm-decisions)
* mood of the group (voting without effect - commentary summary mode?)
* random voter (tool to play with stochacracy feats)
* voting effect scripting (allowing if/else multipath votings, direct access to platform features like notifications, editing attributes of entities owned by the vote-starter)

==Fuzzy Voting==
A more advanced way of voting may be by using a fuzzy approach, using float numbers 0<=x<=1.
The result may be either clear or near 0.5. In either case a weighted (modifying the chance depending on the distance to 0.5) random "coin-throw" can be made available, to facilitate the final decision.

== Secret Voting==
Secret votings could be realised by implementing the "voting machine" algorithm I conceived.
Anonymer Benutzer