Back to the wiki page of the AG Meinungsfindungstool:
http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/AG_Meinungsfindungstool
synchronous / oral communication:
Mumble room AG Meinungsfindungstool [path: Bund / Arbeitsgemeinschaften / Technik (IT)]
Mumble Direct link: http://is.gd/yN0dgS
This is a note pad and NOT an official statement of the Pirate Party!
Mumble working meeting of the AG Meinungsfindungstool:
Tuesday, 20 .05.2014, 21:00 to 22:30 clock
== Participants / Attendees ==
- bloxx
- DerThomas
- Merkbefreiter
- Wolfgang ab 22.14
== Agenda ==
W e are in the prototype implementation phase.
Top 1 - Information from the teams - a short exchange :
(That translator is really funny)
Starting point: Last meeting (13 .05.2013) - https://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/ep/pad/view/ro.7 2Gyr40z93wR2 $ nwcNCIWzAs / latest
- Ontology Definition Team
- Completed
- In working
- Next steps: (HELP WANTED!)
- Feature: Unique constraints allow for individual properties to get the database side CLEARLY as names / aliases for users.
- Refactoring: functions in OntologyContext clean disconnect in between entities (declaration and configuration) and general persistence (SetCurrentOriginator, AddChangeDetail and Save Changes).
- Key to the individual ontology create entities from OWL.
- Group definition within the ontology :
- We Should distinguish two types of groups (open groups and defined groups (authenticated (Triggerwarnung!) members))? absolutely!
- Suggestion:
- open group Refers To Topic (prescribing what reingehört) - you are in fact all he Posts related to
- closed group so Refers topic, but only the posts of the members to the topic Appear in the group
- Problem: Read / Write? Definition? implicit / explicit?
- Now just is not important and did it does now too far +1 +1
- If the authentication task of ontology? (OpenID / PiratenID)
- Probably unfortunately Must be so: Otherwise everyone can spend as someone else +1!
- User / Origin
- Topics complex authentication / groups / permissions
- qKonsens-specific
- ==> At least once different types of groups are trying to work out!
- Reviews are mapped as within groups or aggregated?
- personal opinion (individual)
- Common Position (Group) incl understanding on prev dissent!
- Comparison with eDialogus http://www.imc.com.gr/ontologies/eDialogos/consensus/ # overview
- Comparison with WikiArguments
- Comparison with Findeco
- Comparison with Multilectics
- Comparison with qKonsens
- Comparison with Votorola: http://zelea.com/w/Stuff:Votorola/glossary
- Comparison with X-Tree-M
- Open Questions
- Definition of the terms within the ontology: http://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/disco-Ontologie-Begriffe
- Should text formatting (markup) in the ontology (database) are stored?
- Problem: HTML is only one possible markup language for text formatting. Probably we would need something more abstract: such as wiki markup to use and offer Appropriate conversions.
- Are Characterized Javascript attacks on the plugins possible?
- What is needed to formatting option ?
- Prototype Core Team
- Completed:
- Web API: new version online.
- In Progress:
- JavaScript Library:
- New version of d! Implement sco client library based on JayData.
- Simplifies access to the d! Sco data Dramatically, since the Entire entity-model of Ontology from the metadata of ontology is generated!
- How to manage datajs DEPENDING ON RequireJS library
- jsfiddle.net demos
- Next Steps :
- Web API : Small refactorings: such as divide OntologyContext class etc.
- General: tasks where within the AG MFT can be worked put on the Wiki page - just with one click ==> only on CodePlex, then the wiki.
- Ontology Explorer : Enrichment of generated Web API documentation with individual description.
- It Seems did the Automatically generated documentation can not be used Because this is very wrong.
- There must be created a fully manual web API documentation!
- Open questions:
- Prototype Plug-In Team
- Completed:
- In Progress:
- X-Tree-M ("eXtended-TREE-method")
- Trying to introduce Cookies to enable further features
- qKonsens
- Roadmap: https://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/qkonsens-roadmap
- At the moment I'm cleaning up the code. After that, I will develop the rating functionality.
- "Technic Foo": One JayData request always fails the first time called.
- Rating Total: Some open questions
- What about duplicate user ratings? (Goes foolishly yet)
- Efficient calculation of the sum of ratings? (On the server?)
- What now?
- Different User
- Help content?
- Edit function?
- d!scoArguments:
- Page 'Discussion': Display details of pro and contra arguments
- Deploy new version to test.disco-network.org
- Next Steps:
- X-Tree-M:
- bring sample content on the topic of "grassroots democracy structures" in my local database
- Multi-selection via the shift button
- multiple parent items + acc copy-by-reference operation -> Storing the preferred default by Parents cookie Easier for high Brachiation
- jQuery: http://learn.jquery.com/about-jquery/how-jquery-works/
- Selection with arrow keys
- Possibly stronger indentation
- Logging for fault detection (currently silent crashing triage)
- Examination of the XML database data by program
- Install Probble functionality
- Integration of DISCO database Whenever Client Library Has reached a decent level and qKonsens harmonizes with Multilectics
- History
- qKonsens roadmap: https://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/qkonsens-roadmap
- Multilectics:
- Immediately after qKonsens
- Filter and sort options.
- Meta-discussion under the posts (see stackoverflow.com)
- Home (s), theme browser, group Mgr_innen
- Interest groups. (= Topics)
- User.
- Trust people.
- Edit function
- in veeery Further Zunkunft:
- Manifesto (individual or group level point): EtherPad-Like?
- d scoArguments:
- Page 'discussion': dynamic layout.
- Page 'discussion': load data.
- Open questions:
- Communication Team:
- Completed:
- In Progress:
- d! sco Proof of Concept ( preparation of the User Case Study )
- Design finish and revise formal = "d self-AG"
- The score - User Case Study:
- 04/22/2014 - Bzgl. Cultivation of a theoretical explanation anticipate ran until now only collect and process information and brainstorming ...
- Next Steps:
- @ Slash ==> E-Democracy Talk with Votorola organize and Blinap?
- Wiki Redesign
- Sticky thread for's Forum
- Funding
- That Explained the summary section create & publish
- Incoming Procedure:
- separate meetings
- make in advance of its notes as you would cut
- Open questions :
- Common Tasks
- Completed:
- In Progress:
- Next Steps:
- Open questions:
Top 2 - Various Topics
- Meeting with George: Funding and other stuff.
- we need to form some kind of legal entity
- mondragon
- rework of the already existing proposal
- start refinement of proposal autum 2014
- submission deadline early 2015
- project start approx. autum 2015
- project lifetime 2 - 3 years
- cooperation of 6-8 organisations
- different types of roles
- our role might be to serve the user basis
- Do we want more publicity at the moment? I'm not sure...
== Decisions / Decisions ==
== Nächste Themen / Next Topics ==
Next date == / == NextDate
- Tuesday, 2 7 . May 2014, 21 clock in Mumble-space "AG Meinungsfindungstool"
Meeting at the end == / == End of Session